Machine.Specifications.Mvc
1.5.51.2
dotnet add package Machine.Specifications.Mvc --version 1.5.51.2
NuGet\Install-Package Machine.Specifications.Mvc -Version 1.5.51.2
This command is intended to be used within the Package Manager Console in Visual Studio, as it uses the NuGet module's version of Install-Package.
<PackageReference Include="Machine.Specifications.Mvc" Version="1.5.51.2" />
For projects that support PackageReference, copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package.
paket add Machine.Specifications.Mvc --version 1.5.51.2
The NuGet Team does not provide support for this client. Please contact its maintainers for support.
#r "nuget: Machine.Specifications.Mvc, 1.5.51.2"
#r directive can be used in F# Interactive and Polyglot Notebooks. Copy this into the interactive tool or source code of the script to reference the package.
// Install Machine.Specifications.Mvc as a Cake Addin #addin nuget:?package=Machine.Specifications.Mvc&version=1.5.51.2 // Install Machine.Specifications.Mvc as a Cake Tool #tool nuget:?package=Machine.Specifications.Mvc&version=1.5.51.2
The NuGet Team does not provide support for this client. Please contact its maintainers for support.
Machine.Specifications.Mvc is a set of extensions for testing ASP.Net MVC specific types.
It aims to ease the testing of ActionResult objects returned from MVC Controllers by providing an Machine.Specifications (MSpec) BDD syntax over these types.
v1.0.2.0 - Added support for Partial View (ShouldBeAPartialView)
Product | Versions Compatible and additional computed target framework versions. |
---|---|
.NET Framework | net is compatible. |
Compatible target framework(s)
Included target framework(s) (in package)
Learn more about Target Frameworks and .NET Standard.
-
- Machine.Specifications (>= 0.5.10)
GitHub repositories
This package is not used by any popular GitHub repositories.
Refactored "And" objects to a single generic object. Some return types in ActionResultExtensions (i.e. ViewResultAnd became ActionResultAnd<ViewResult>), so it could break someone's code if they wrote extension methods based on those return types.